Framework for evaluating country preparedness
|
The framework below serves as a starting point for evaluating a country's preparedness for comprehensive country-led governance assessment. Applying the framework helps to inform the design of a possible initiative and give an indication of the constraints, opportunities, risks and capacity deficits that a governance self-assessment national programme should seek to address.
Table 1: Framework for evaluating preparedness
|
||
|
Assessment Dimension
|
Explanation of dimension
|
Key questions
|
|
Political and development context
|
The political and development context of the country is important for determining the entry points of a country-led governance assessment, especially ensuring that such an initiative bolsters the country’s national development and governance reform priorities.
|
|
|
Political commitment
|
Political leadership is critical for the effective development and use of governance assessments. For assessments to be embedded and used in national policymaking by state and non-state actors, they need to have the backing of the political leadership as well as effective mechanisms in place to facilitate dialogue between state and non-state actors.
|
|
|
Institutional capacities
|
A solid assessment of the institutional capacities within a country is necessary to ensure that the national statistical system is sufficiently able to undertake and sustain data collection activities. The statistical system includes not only the national statistical agency but also statistics producers in line ministries, even though the former is responsible for producing "official statistics." Capacities to coordinate across the state and non-state institutions that produce governance data are extremely important. In addition, capacities of non-state actors in producing non-statistical evidence should be kept in focus.
|
|
|
Managerial capabilities
|
The managerial leadership to implement a comprehensive governance assessment is important. Managerial competencies should combine political as well as administrative skills into a multi-disciplinary team or task force that will lead in designing an inclusive, multi-stakeholder process to develop a set of governance indicators as part of a national governance database.
|
|
|
Resources
|
The resources for financing multi-stakeholder consultations and dialogues, as well as the financial resources required for collecting governance data, will be considerable. Assessment should be made of in-country and external resources that are potentially available for implementing and sustaining a national initiative.
|
|


