Desde lo Local (Strategic Decentralisation for Local Development – Mexico)

Purpose

The purpose of Desde lo Local is to provide a diagnostic tool to support the three government levels (national, federal and municipal) in providing specific solutions to the daily problems of citizens and local authorities. The selfassessment tool corresponds to the first step of the Agenda Desde lo Local.The following steps are the verification of the municipal self-evaluation, the proposal and implementation of solutions for areas where indicators scores were low, and the emission of certificates acknowledging municipal improvements.

Types of data used

Objective data, based on municipal statistics and regulation, administrative data on population, budgets, provisions of public services and procedures.

Methodology

The entire self-assessment tool is composed of 39 indicators organised in the 4 above-mentioned categories, along with 257 “parameters”. The two categories of Institutional Development for a Good Government and the Socially Inclusive Development include the following indicators: The following table presents an example of the ‘parameters’ and ‘means of verification’ defined for indicator 1.4. on ‘participatory municipality’. There are three levels of evaluation for each indicator: Green = municipal practices of high quality Yellow = municipal practices under acceptable quality; Red = municipal practices not acceptable. The following table provides two examples of scoring criteria based on the “evaluation colours”. In order to obtain a “green evaluation” for a specific indicator, all the parameters belonging to it must be green. If only one parameter is yellow or red, the indicator will be yellow or red, respectively. The self-evaluation of the municipality is then verified by a third independent entity – such as an academic institution or research outfit, recognised by the State and the municipality as an impartial and competent reviewer. Once the evaluation
is completed, municipalities that present red indicators choose at least three areas where the three levels of government will coordinate actions and programmes to bring improvements and achieve green scores, and obtain a certificate of quality.

Region
Latin America and the Caribbean
Area of Governance
Local Governance and Decentralization
Pro-poor /gender sensitive aspects
There is a gender-focused indicator (indicator 3.4.) assessing whether the municipality promotes gender equity in the category “Socially Inclusive Development”. This indicator introduces 22 different parameters to assess municipal capacity to promote gender equity, including the existence of municipal programmes in relation to day
nursery, institutional and entrepreneurial awareness in gender recruiting, individual and collective credit schemes for women, to recruitment of women in public administrations, etc.
There is a poverty-focused indicator (indicator 3.11) assessing whether the municipality runs specific programmes to fight poverty, in the category “Socially Inclusive Development”. This indicator introduces 22 different parameters to assess municipal capacity to fight poverty, including the existence of municipal programmes of training and education for low-income adult population, of job creation, credit and food security for the poorest, as well as the existence of coordination mechanisms amongst different levels governments and with civil society to fight poverty.
Example indicators

Parameters and means of verification defined for indicator 1.4 on participatory municipality:

PARTICIPATORY MUNICIPALITY
1.4.1 System of democratic participation -  Is there a committee for municipal planning?
1.4.2 Number and type of citizen participation bodies  - Which are the existing commissions and councils in the
municipality?
1.4.3 Mechanisms of citizens consultation for the implementation of policies and programmes - Are there mechanisms of citizens consultation for the
implementation of policies and programmes
1.4.4 Areas or instances promoting citizens participation - Are there areas or instances promoting citizens participation?
1.4.5 Collaboration with civil society organisations - Are there any means of collaborating with civil society organisations? Of what kind?
1.4.6 The municipality organises citizens consultations for evaluating municipal management - Is the municipality organising citizens consultations for
the management evaluation?
1.4.7 Mechanisms and bodies for social controllership - Are there mechanisms and bodies for social controllership?
Of which kind? What is their role?
1.4.8 Procedures for the collection of citizens’ petitions, complaints, denounces and suggestion, with an institutional follow up - Are there any procedures for the collection of citizens’ petitions, complaints and suggestions, with an institutional follow up?

Where to find this tool
UNDP Support