| Purpose |
It is designed primarily for use by European Union (EU) election observers, both new and experienced. In addition, it is hoped that the handbook can contribute to the existing knowledge of work about election observation and its role in the field of human rights and democratisation. In this regard, the handbook may also be used by representatives of host governments, civil society activists, especially domestic observers, election administrators, politicians, and other international bodies involved in election observation. |
|---|---|
| Types of data used |
The EU election observation methodology ensures that information on the conduct of an election and other indicators of the wider democratic environment are gathered systematically by an EU EOM. The use of international standards for elections, as established in universal instruments, as well as, best practice for democratic elections, ensures that information gathered is assessed through a standard approach that is relevant to all countries. Assessment of an election does not involve comparis on between individual countries. Safeguards are provided against subjective or part isan assessments of the election process. The assessment work of an EU EOM is undertaken through the direct observation of electoral events by EU observers and analysis of information obtained from relevant documents and meetings with a broad range of national and regional election stakeholders EU election observation methodology comprehensively focuses on all aspects and stages of an election process (see Section Four). In their reports, EU EOMs will cover the following twelve areas of assessment: (i) political context |
| Methodology |
International standards for elections stem from political rights and fundamental freedoms which are enshrined in universal and regional instruments.These instruments establish legal and political commitments to meet specific standards in relation to elections. EU observers assess an election process in terms of compliance with international standards for elections. These standards relate to the following:
• the right and opportunity, without any distinction or unreasonable restrictions, for citizens to participate in government and public affairs through: |
| Area of Governance |
Electoral Systems
|
| Pro-poor /gender sensitive aspects |
The methodology is designed to be sensitive to different kind of discrimination that may take place with regards to the holding of elections. |
| Example indicators |
Free Expression of Will |
| Where to find this tool | |
| Actionability |
The framework is very actionable, detailing where there are shortcomings in order to facilitate policy interventions. |
| Complementarity |
The assessment framework is coomplimentary, and looks both at the legal context and the supply and management of the elections, as well as the actual implementation. |