Index of Responsibility,Transparency and Accountability (Macedonia)

Purpose

The overall objective of this Index is to increase accountability, responsibility and transparency of local governments, which will foster better local governance at the local level. In particular, the Index is designed to make measurable assessments of the capacity of a given institution to combat corruption, by identifying those ‘points’ most vulnerable to corruption, the specific mechanisms that can be used to prevent corruption, indicators measuring the effectiveness of these mechanisms, and criteria to score these indicators.

Types of data used

Mainly based on objective information, including available administrative data on budgets, procedures and functions related to the local public administration.

Methodology
Perceptions from experts and users of municipal services have been used as an important source in the design of the tool, namely to identify corruption “hot spots” which need to be monitored. The Index covers three main areas of competence of local government: urban planning, financial management and property, and public  procurement. For each of these areas, the Index identifies four aspects:
 
  1. 10 to 15 “hot-spots” or “critical points” for corruption in local government,
  2. the corresponding anticorruption mechanisms that can prevent the appearance of corrupt practices
  3. the corresponding indicators of the existence and proper functioning of such mechanisms.
  4. The scoring of indicators based on welldefined criteria
The final RTA Index value is obtained by the simple arithmetic average value of the indicator scores.
Region
Europe and CIS
Area of Governance
Local Governance and Decentralization
Pro-poor /gender sensitive aspects

No explicit gender or poverty focus.

Example indicators

Example of “critical points” of corruption, anti-corruption mechanisms and indicator for one competence areas of local government:

  • “critical points” of corruption - Development, adoption and revision of a General Urban Plan (GUP) and Detailed Urban Plan (DUP) without the participation of a participative body
  • anticorruption mechanisms - Setting up a qualified Participative body and its direct and active participation in the development and revision of the GUP and DUP
  • Indicators - Minutes from the work of the Participative body, number of negative opinions from competent organisations on the proposed versions of GUP and DUP
  • Scoring of indicators - There are minutes confirming the active participation of the Participative body >3 points,  There are minutes, no confirmation of active participation of the Participative body > 2 points, There are no minutes >>> 1 point
Where to find this tool
UNDP Support